Research Publications
Peer-reviewed outputs from the Center's research teams, and the standards we hold ourselves to in publishing them.
Publication as an obligation
Our founding objectives commit the Center to disseminate research findings in accordance with applicable ethical standards and regulatory requirements, on a non-profit basis. Publishing is therefore something we owe, not something we do when a result is flattering.
That includes results that did not work. A method that failed validation is genuinely useful information to the next group considering the same approach, and withholding it wastes their time and money. We treat negative and null findings as publishable outputs.
Our publication record will appear here
Peer-reviewed papers from the Center's research teams will be listed here with full citations and links, as they are published. We will not list publications, preprints or citations that do not yet exist.
How we publish
Commitments that apply to every output from the Center.
- Open access wherever the publication route permits it
- Methods described in enough detail to be reproduced independently
- Funding sources declared on every output
- Competing interests declared by every author
- Authorship reflects genuine intellectual contribution
- Negative and null results published, not shelved
- Data shared where consent and ethical approval allow
- Corrections issued promptly where an error is identified
Other formats we publish in
Beyond peer-reviewed papers, the Center publishes policy briefs, technical reports, books and plain-language articles — because different audiences need different formats.
Collaborate on a publication
We welcome co-authorship enquiries, requests to review, and approaches from organisations commissioning evidence reviews.